Minutes for Historic Board on July 10, 2006, 06:00 PM
LOWELL HISTORIC BOARD
PUBLIC
HEARING
July 10, 2006 at 6:00 p.m.
MEMBERS
PRESENT OTHERS
PRESENT
Reynold
Ilg, Chairman George
Eliades, 375 Broadway Street
Peter
Aucella Russ
Eliades
Rachel
Edlund Mark
E. Goldman
David
Gray John
Ho, 375 Broadway Street
Richard
Lockhart Sally
Ho, 375 Broadway Street
Martha
Mayo James
Jozokos, Paul Davies & Associates
Cindy
Tang
Sarah Uhlendorf, Assistant Administrator
Stephen Stowell,
Administrator
1. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. AND-06-07: 375 Broadway Street
Application for an Historic Permit for demolition of
existing structure and construction of a new mixed use structure with
associated site improvements.
The Chairman read the published
Public Hearing Notice and declared the Hearing open to those wishing to speak
in favor of the application.
The Chairman recognized Jim Jozokos from Paul Davies
& Associates, architect for the project, representing John and Sally
Ho. He stated that they are proposing
to demolish the existent vacant building and building a three-story structure
which would house two storefronts and a residence on the upper floors.
Mr. Jozokos stated that based on their preliminary
informational with the Board, the site plan reflects the Board’s preference to
have the building elevation on Broadway Street be as long as possible and the
parking to be located in the back quarter of the lot. He continued to further explain the site plan, including parking
and fencing. He also explained the
features of the building, including business entrances and proposed deck on the
second floor for the residential unit.
Mr. Jozokos stated that the materials to be use will
be either wood or Hardiplank, which will be painted. He stated that the roof will be asphalt shingles and that they
are currently looking into a company which still manufactures metal storefront
elements, which can possibly be integrated into the storefronts of this
building.
The Chairman asked if there was anyone else wishing
to speak in favor.
The Chairman recognized Mark Goldman who stated that
he felt this project would be a great addition to the community and fits well
into the Acre Revitalization Plan.
The Chairman recognized Attorney George Eliades who
stated that the Ho’s are a very hardworking couple who have invested in the
community with their business on Market Street and with this project they are
further investing their money in the Acre.
He stated that he felt projects like this one were extremely important
to the neighborhood, economy and the people of Lowell. He closed by stating that he hoped the Board
looked favorably on the project.
Having asked aloud one more
time if anyone else wished to speak on behalf of the proponents and hearing no
one, the Chairman declared the Hearing closed to proponents and opened the
Hearing to those who wished to speak in opposition.
Having asked aloud 3 times and hearing no one, the
Chairman declared the Hearing closed to opponents and opened the Hearing to
comments or question from Board members and the staff.
Mr. Aucella asked Mr. Jozokos to explain the
differences in the plans the Board received and the plans he was presenting,
specifically on the Broadway Street elevation.
Mr. Jozokos stated that additional consultation with Design Review has
led to a dimensional reduction of the piers adjoining the tower so that they
look similar to the other corners of the building.
Mr. Aucella asked about the drawings and the small
windows at the corner. Mr. Jozokos
stated that the drawing was a perspective view at an angle, since the building
is not at on a true 90-degree corner.
The Chairman asked about the materials for the rear
deck. Mr. Jozokos stated it will be made
from either wood or Fypron material which will be painted consistently with the
colors of the rest of the building.
The Chairman asked if the windows in the tower would
be fixed. Mr. Jozokos stated that they
would be fixed and that at the roof there will be a tower on the rear of the
tower from which you can access the roof.
Mr. Jozokos also stated that the elevator and
mechanical units will be located on the roof, but will not be visible due to a
42” parapet.
Mr. Aucella asked about the significance of the
different colored columns in the plans.
Mr. Jozokos stated that one color is to signify free standing columns
where the deck extends over the parking area in the rear.
Mr. Aucella asked if there would only be one
residential unit in the upper floors.
Mr. Jozokos stated that was correct and that it would be the applicant’s
residence.
Mr. Lockhart asked what the height of the tower was
relative to the buildings surrounding it.
Mr. Jozokos stated that the building next to it is a 3.5 story building
and this will be a little higher that that.
Mr. Gray asked how tall the tower was from the top
of the roof line. Mr. Jozokos stated
that it was approximately 10 feet above the parapet.
Mr. Aucella asked about how the geometry of the top
of the tower came about. Mr. Jozokos
stated that the angle of the street is approximately 76 degrees and they worked
an 8-sided object that has equal sides, but is squat, with the assistance of
Chuck Parrott and the Administrator.
The Administrator further added that due to the odd shape of the lot,
this seemed to be the best option.
The Chairman asked what would be located inside the
tower. Mr. Jozokos stated that it will
be a staircase up to the master bedroom and roof.
Mr. Aucella asked if they will have a deck on the
roof. The Administrator stated that
they could, but one would never be able to tell due to the 42” parapet.
Ms. Edlund asked if Mr. Jozokos had a plan of the
tower roof, looking down on it and how it is situated. Mr. Jozokos stated that he did not have it
with him, but that he could sketch it for her, which he did.
Mr. Aucella asked if the fixed windows in the tower
were something the Board wanted to see.
The Administrator stated that Design Review felt they were appropriate
and would further distinguish the building as new construction rather than an
historic building.
Mr. Gray asked if the plan showed a door from the
tower onto the roof. Mr. Jozokos stated
that was correct. Mr. Gray stated that
they would then have access to the roof from here. Mr. Jozokos stated that was correct.
Motion by Mr. Aucella, seconded by
Mr. Lockhart, to:
vote to issue the Historic Permit for demolition of the existing building and construction of a new mixed use structure with associated site improvements at 375 Broadway Street in the Acre Neighborhood District conditional upon the following:
· Submittal, review, and approval of final design and construction details including, but not limited to,
specifications for door and window systems, storefronts, paint color, shingles, light fixtures, and signage prior to commencement of individual work items. Material and color samples will be required for paint (on-site paint sample), brick, and shingles;
· Hardiplank siding and trim to have smooth (not raised grain) surface. Sample of final selection to be
submitted for review and approval prior to purchase and installation;
· Submittal, review, and approval of final details related to the site plan, landscaping, and other site features
including, but not limited to, planting schedule, fencing, dumpsters/screens, site signage, and lighting prior to commencement of individual work items; and
· Submittal, review, and approval of any scope of work alterations and final details prior to commencement
of work.
Work is consistent with Section 2.103, 3.1, 3.101, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13 and 3.3 of the Acre Neighborhood District Design Review Standards.
Unanimously
approved, 6-0.
The Public Hearings were closed at 7:15 p.m.
LOWELL HISTORIC BOARD
REGULAR
MEETING
July 10, 2006 at 6:00 p.m.
MEMBERS
PRESENT OTHERS
PRESENT
Reynold
Ilg, Chairman Sarah
Uhlendorf, Assistant Administrator
Peter
Aucella Stephen
Stowell, Administrator
Rachel
Edlund
David
Gray
Richard
Lockhart
Martha
Mayo
2. MINUTES
Approval of the Minutes of June 12, 2006.
Motion by Mr. Lockhart, seconded by Ms. Mayo, to:
approve the Minutes of June 12, 2006 as presented.
Unanimously
approved, 6-0.
3. OTHER
BUSINESS
A.
99 Willie Street/Nextel Informational Presentation
The Chairman stated that Nextel declined to present
to the Board this month.
The Administrator stated that Design Review will be
meeting with Nextel in anticipation of an application being heard before the
Board at the August 14 meeting.
B. Enforcement/Violations
Update
The Administrator stated that
staff has handed out an updated packed of all violations that have been sent
out with information about their on-going status. He also stated that there are about 20 additional Request for
Compliance letters which will go out this week.
The Administrator asked the Board to vote to issue Order for Compliance for The Simpson Block (1 Merrimack Street) and the Diplomat Building (72 Merrimack Street) for no communication regarding minimum maintenance violations.
Motion by Mr. Aucella, seconded by Ms. Edlund, to:
vote to issue Order for Compliance letters to 72
Merrimack Street and 1 Merrimack Street.
Unanimously approved, 6-0.
Mr. Aucella asked about the
status of minimum maintenance on the Petren Building on Bridge Street. The Administrator stated that staff is
working with the property owner to complete work that they had begun. He also stated that the building has also
been tagged with graffiti and he would be in touch with the Health Department
on the graffiti ordinance and to make sure it is properly removed.
The Administrator stated
that he has also been in touch with the owner of 35 Market Street (SMP)
regarding the submittal of a canopy design to replace the existing fascia that
was installed when the former canopy was removed.
Ms. Mayo asked about
violations at the Blue Shamrock. The
Administrator stated that a Cease and Desist Order was sent for unauthorized
painting and that the owner had stopped the painting before Board notification
has he had not authorized it. He stated
that he is working with the owner on resolving the paint and signage issues.
Ms. Mayo asked about
cigarette buckets outside of the Down the Street Café and if that is under our
purview. The Administrator stated that
he would look further into it.
The Administrator added that
staff will be meeting with the CBA and their property management company to
work on violations within their properties as well.
C. Administrator’s Report
The Administrator stated
that review and permitting is further explained in the notes.
He stated that the Father
Garin statue is still at Nuestra Senora del Carmen and that the developer for
this site will go before the ZBA in the next couple of weeks for the permit for
housing.
The Administrator stated
that he will be attending NAPC Forum in Baltimore for a couple of days at the
end of July. He also stated that
National Trust for Historic Preservation conference in Pittsburgh is coming up
and he and the Assistant Administrator will be seeking approval to attend.
The Administrator asked the
Board if it would be acceptable to have the DPD Asset Manager coordinate the
disposition of 26-28 Lawrence Street.
The Board agreed that was acceptable.
Staff is working on the
National Register nomination for Saint George’s Antiochian Church.
D. Board Member Items/Inquiries
The Chairman stated that last week an issue regarding the neighborhood districts came up. The Administrator stated that he received a phone call about a proposed swimming pool on Mansur Street. He stated that this was agreed on by the Board when the districts were created, that it would not get into the small nuances of the site, only demolition or new construction of buildings in the district.
The Chairman asked the Board and the Administrator if there was an issue regarding definitions of what we should and should not review.
Mr. Aucella asked if we need a one-page fact sheet on what we do and do not review in neighborhood districts.
The Chairman stated that he doesn’t want the Board to be reviewing things that they should not be and that there still appears to be some questions regarding what is reviewed in the districts.
The Administrator asked the Board if they felt it should be a fact sheet or a technical correction to the Standards which further defines what new construction and demolition are define as in these districts.
Ms. Mayo asked if the guidelines were on the website. The Administrator stated that the maps and guidelines for the neighborhood districts are on the website.
The Administrator stated that staff will work on an informational sheet which he will send to Board Members for questions and comments.
Ms. Mayo stated that she thought the Board should think about review of landscape and trees on these properties. The Board agreed that that was out of their jurisdiction in these districts.
4. ADJOURNMENT
Motion
by Mr. Lockhart, seconded by Mr. Aucella, to:
adjourn the meeting at 6:35 p.m.
Unanimously approved, 6-0.
_______________________________
Sarah Uhlendorf, Assistant Administrator
Stephen R. Stowell, Administrator
Lowell
Historic Board
