Minutes for Zoning Board of Appeals on January 26, 2009, 06:30 PM
|
|
Minutes
of the Lowell Zoning Board of Appeals for the Meeting held on
January 26, 2009
Meeting
of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held in the City Council Chambers, Second
Floor, City Hall,
Chairman Geary called the meeting to order
and stated that there were a number of petitions that he expects to move
forward quickly, as well as some that he expects will take a considerable
amount of time; therefore, petitions will be called out-of-order than that as
presented on the agenda.
Chairman asked that any one wishing to
address the board should be sure to state their name and address for the
record, and also sign in at the podium so as not to be interrupted while
speaking.
ZB-2008-000048 (081124-052)
Petition Type: Variance
Applicant: RTJ REALTY LLC
Re Property
Located at:
Applicable Zoning Bylaws: RR - Regional Retail
Petition: to raze an existing structure and
construct a new commercial building within 15 feet of the USF residential
zoning district according to Sections 4.5.4 and 5.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Chairman read petition into record, read letter into record from
Attorney Forsley to continue til May 27, 2009, the applicant is unprepared;
opens to the board.
No one has any questions.
Mr. Belanger, motion to continue.
? Seconded the motion.
ZB-2006-000047 (2006-0047)
Petition Type: Administrative
Review of Previously Granted Relief
Applicant: City of
Re Property
Located at:
Applicable Zoning Bylaws: UMF - Urban Multi Family
Petition: to re-affirm Special Permit and
Variance granted December 2003, but not exercised, to substitute the
non-conforming use of storage warehouse to studios for musicians;without the
required parking in the former M4 zoning district.
Chairman, Adam Baacke emailed request to continue til
February 9th, anyone have questions or comments?
Mr. Belanger, board granted special permit and variance
awhile back, made the motion to continue.
Mr. Nuon, seconded the motion.
ZB-2009-000001 (090126-003)
Petition Type: Variance
Applicant: PHATHANAK
PHONEPHASAY PHATHANAK PHOMMY
Re Property
Located at:
Applicable Zoning Bylaws: TSF – Traditional Single Family
Petition: to construct an addition to a single
family with insufficient side yard setback in accordance with Art. V, Section
5.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Chairman, read petition into record.
Olivia,
Chairman, needs sketches as to what this will look like, plot
plan? outlined gap, rough sketch of addition of house, requesting sketch, match
roofline?
Olivia, yes, same height.
Mr. Bailey, who owns the fence on the side? chainlink fence
Olivia, its the neighbors fence to the right
Mr. Knox, rended the sketch?
Mr. Nuon, they are not familiar with process, roof will be
the same, requests pics to protect petitioner, vote with conditions added.
Chairman, prefers not to do, put condition prior to building
anything
Mr. Belanger, well maintained home, nice area, wants to see
finished product; pics before constructions, backyard has considerable slop -
sewerage?
Chairman, scales are wrong 1-20 inces
Mr. Cavanaugh, nice neighborhood, no one expanded property
line, consider extending rear not nice, requesting pictures, any changes to
parking/driveway - shedd not entirement on lot either, speak to neighbors, sign
petition and bring to the board.
Chairman, when was the house purchased?
Olivia, 1996?
Chairman, shedd on property when purchasde?
Olivia, No, added on
Chairman, FYI move over a few feet if selling the house,
needs assurance it will be done right/properly, make sure scales are right and
the foundation, is the shedd against the fence?
Olivia, no there is room for it.
Building Commissioner, fence runs to back corner? not showing
fence on lot line
Chairman, ask Mr. Ahoe about plot plan and continue
Building Commissioner, may be good opportunity to correct
plot plan, will get a hold of surveyor and let him know
Chairman, get sketch of addtion
Mr. Bienvenue, 1-20 scale, fence put there and shedd was put
up - appears to be closer to deck but it isn't, may have encrouchments on
property
Chairman, make sure of what we are approving
Building Commisioner, will talk to Mr. Ahoe
Chairman, come back on February 9th with a sketch and check
with the builder and consider putting it in the back rather than the side.
Mr. Cavanaugh, needs legal guidance based on the shape,
present case to us as to why it can't be done in the rear.
Chairman, all of those in favor, none, all of those in
opposition, none, closed the the public.
Mr. Nuon, motion to continue.
Mr. Knox, seconded the motion.


